20 February 2009 @ 10:15 pm
[Poll] Moar Science!  
A number of people have made excellent points about the poll, round one. First, obviously it was wrong wrong wrong of me to combine Torchwood and Doctor Who, and against the nature of SCIENCE. Second, I left out a number of fandoms that clearly needed to be subjected to the keen-eyed scrutiny of SCIENCE. (Thanks to everyone who suggested one, and I tried to grab them all. If I missed one, um, sorry!)

So, behind the cut: yet more science, for your scientific convenience!



Remember, one = low low quality (fanfiction.net would be ashamed to host it!) or low low slashiness (rulers dream of being so straight!). Ten = super high quality (earth-shattering genius, like Shakespeare except BETTER!) or super high slashiness (time spent canonically sucking cock or fingering each other could only reduce the overall slashy quotient!).

And, again, vote based on what you think. Never mind fandom's opinion! I want to look into your heart, your soul, your brain. Or, rather, SCIENCE does.

And thank you. With your help, we will at last be able to plot our loves on a really shiny chart. I think that's a dream we can all embrace.

Poll #1352948 Science, Take Two

Doctor Who (new): how slashy?

Mean: 5.62 Median: 6 Std. Dev 1.81
1
1(0.4%)
2
8(3.5%)
3
22(9.6%)
4
38(16.7%)
5
30(13.2%)
6
55(24.1%)
7
39(17.1%)
8
25(11.0%)
9
7(3.1%)
10
3(1.3%)

Doctor Who (new): canon writing quality?

Mean: 6.96 Median: 7 Std. Dev 1.55
1
0(0.0%)
2
0(0.0%)
3
8(3.6%)
4
11(4.9%)
5
17(7.6%)
6
33(14.7%)
7
70(31.2%)
8
54(24.1%)
9
24(10.7%)
10
7(3.1%)

Torchwood: how slashy?

Mean: 9.45 Median: 10 Std. Dev 0.97
1
0(0.0%)
2
0(0.0%)
3
0(0.0%)
4
1(0.4%)
5
0(0.0%)
6
5(2.1%)
7
6(2.5%)
8
19(8.0%)
9
48(20.2%)
10
159(66.8%)

Torchwood: canon writing quality?

Mean: 5.11 Median: 5 Std. Dev 1.92
1
1(0.4%)
2
16(6.9%)
3
38(16.3%)
4
43(18.5%)
5
35(15.0%)
6
44(18.9%)
7
30(12.9%)
8
15(6.4%)
9
7(3.0%)
10
4(1.7%)

Man from U.N.C.L.E.: how slashy?

Mean: 7.47 Median: 8 Std. Dev 1.87
1
1(1.2%)
2
1(1.2%)
3
1(1.2%)
4
0(0.0%)
5
11(12.8%)
6
12(14.0%)
7
10(11.6%)
8
20(23.3%)
9
21(24.4%)
10
9(10.5%)

Man from U.N.C.L.E.: canon writing quality?

Mean: 5.54 Median: 6 Std. Dev 1.44
1
1(1.3%)
2
2(2.6%)
3
5(6.4%)
4
5(6.4%)
5
24(30.8%)
6
18(23.1%)
7
20(25.6%)
8
3(3.8%)
9
0(0.0%)
10
0(0.0%)

Starsky & Hutch (and I take that ampersand is canon): how slashy?

Mean: 8.67 Median: 9 Std. Dev 1.39
1
0(0.0%)
2
1(0.9%)
3
0(0.0%)
4
0(0.0%)
5
3(2.7%)
6
3(2.7%)
7
10(8.8%)
8
27(23.9%)
9
31(27.4%)
10
38(33.6%)

Starsky & Hutch: canon writing quality?

Mean: 5.56 Median: 6 Std. Dev 1.73
1
0(0.0%)
2
5(5.1%)
3
9(9.1%)
4
9(9.1%)
5
21(21.2%)
6
30(30.3%)
7
16(16.2%)
8
4(4.0%)
9
2(2.0%)
10
3(3.0%)

The Professionals: how slashy?

Mean: 7.62 Median: 8 Std. Dev 1.59
1
0(0.0%)
2
0(0.0%)
3
2(3.1%)
4
0(0.0%)
5
5(7.8%)
6
5(7.8%)
7
15(23.4%)
8
18(28.1%)
9
12(18.8%)
10
7(10.9%)

The Professionals: canon writing quality?

Mean: 6.33 Median: 6 Std. Dev 1.59
1
0(0.0%)
2
0(0.0%)
3
1(1.6%)
4
7(11.5%)
5
12(19.7%)
6
14(23.0%)
7
12(19.7%)
8
10(16.4%)
9
3(4.9%)
10
2(3.3%)

Star Wars 4-6 (original trilogy): how slashy?

Mean: 4.89 Median: 5 Std. Dev 1.89
1
10(4.6%)
2
16(7.4%)
3
23(10.6%)
4
41(18.9%)
5
42(19.4%)
6
42(19.4%)
7
23(10.6%)
8
16(7.4%)
9
4(1.8%)
10
0(0.0%)

Star Wars 4-6 (original trilogy): canon writing quality?

Mean: 6.36 Median: 7 Std. Dev 1.68
1
2(0.9%)
2
3(1.4%)
3
7(3.2%)
4
20(9.3%)
5
27(12.5%)
6
41(19.0%)
7
61(28.2%)
8
41(19.0%)
9
11(5.1%)
10
3(1.4%)

Star Wars: The Phantom Menace: how slashy?

Mean: 6.70 Median: 7 Std. Dev 2.02
1
6(3.1%)
2
3(1.5%)
3
9(4.6%)
4
6(3.1%)
5
22(11.3%)
6
24(12.4%)
7
46(23.7%)
8
49(25.3%)
9
21(10.8%)
10
8(4.1%)

Star Wars: The Phantom Menace: canon writing quality?

Mean: 3.52 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.76
1
22(11.4%)
2
42(21.8%)
3
41(21.2%)
4
35(18.1%)
5
25(13.0%)
6
16(8.3%)
7
8(4.1%)
8
3(1.6%)
9
1(0.5%)
10
0(0.0%)

X-Files: how slashy?

Mean: 5.66 Median: 6 Std. Dev 2.00
1
7(4.0%)
2
9(5.2%)
3
7(4.0%)
4
18(10.4%)
5
33(19.1%)
6
38(22.0%)
7
31(17.9%)
8
24(13.9%)
9
0(0.0%)
10
6(3.5%)

X-Files: canon writing quality?

Mean: 7.01 Median: 7 Std. Dev 1.51
1
0(0.0%)
2
0(0.0%)
3
3(1.8%)
4
6(3.5%)
5
19(11.1%)
6
28(16.4%)
7
52(30.4%)
8
35(20.5%)
9
21(12.3%)
10
7(4.1%)

Sports Night: how slashy?

Mean: 7.66 Median: 8 Std. Dev 1.60
1
0(0.0%)
2
2(1.3%)
3
1(0.7%)
4
1(0.7%)
5
9(6.0%)
6
16(10.7%)
7
34(22.8%)
8
42(28.2%)
9
24(16.1%)
10
20(13.4%)

Sports Night: canon writing quality?

Mean: 8.31 Median: 9 Std. Dev 1.50
1
0(0.0%)
2
1(0.7%)
3
1(0.7%)
4
3(2.1%)
5
3(2.1%)
6
5(3.5%)
7
16(11.3%)
8
41(28.9%)
9
42(29.6%)
10
30(21.1%)

The O.C.: how slashy?

Mean: 7.16 Median: 7 Std. Dev 1.69
1
0(0.0%)
2
0(0.0%)
3
1(1.4%)
4
3(4.1%)
5
12(16.4%)
6
7(9.6%)
7
14(19.2%)
8
24(32.9%)
9
4(5.5%)
10
8(11.0%)

The O.C.: canon writing quality?

Mean: 5.39 Median: 6 Std. Dev 1.65
1
1(1.4%)
2
2(2.8%)
3
7(9.9%)
4
11(15.5%)
5
14(19.7%)
6
16(22.5%)
7
13(18.3%)
8
7(9.9%)
9
0(0.0%)
10
0(0.0%)

Hikaru no Go: how slashy?

Mean: 8.29 Median: 9 Std. Dev 1.72
1
0(0.0%)
2
0(0.0%)
3
2(2.9%)
4
0(0.0%)
5
6(8.7%)
6
2(2.9%)
7
6(8.7%)
8
12(17.4%)
9
24(34.8%)
10
17(24.6%)

Hikaru no Go: canon writing quality?

Mean: 8.00 Median: 8 Std. Dev 1.80
1
0(0.0%)
2
0(0.0%)
3
1(1.5%)
4
0(0.0%)
5
7(10.3%)
6
7(10.3%)
7
12(17.6%)
8
9(13.2%)
9
12(17.6%)
10
20(29.4%)
 
 
( Read 37 commentsLeave a comment )
Mal: m+m=/ by nialla42malnpudl on February 21st, 2009 09:00 am (UTC)
Damn. If I'd known there was going to be a Round 2, I'd have made a case for Alias Smith and Jones. Now there were two boys who luuurrrrrved each other. *g* And the writing has held up surprisingly well, all things considered.