20 February 2009 @ 10:15 pm
[Poll] Moar Science!  
A number of people have made excellent points about the poll, round one. First, obviously it was wrong wrong wrong of me to combine Torchwood and Doctor Who, and against the nature of SCIENCE. Second, I left out a number of fandoms that clearly needed to be subjected to the keen-eyed scrutiny of SCIENCE. (Thanks to everyone who suggested one, and I tried to grab them all. If I missed one, um, sorry!)

So, behind the cut: yet more science, for your scientific convenience!



Remember, one = low low quality (fanfiction.net would be ashamed to host it!) or low low slashiness (rulers dream of being so straight!). Ten = super high quality (earth-shattering genius, like Shakespeare except BETTER!) or super high slashiness (time spent canonically sucking cock or fingering each other could only reduce the overall slashy quotient!).

And, again, vote based on what you think. Never mind fandom's opinion! I want to look into your heart, your soul, your brain. Or, rather, SCIENCE does.

And thank you. With your help, we will at last be able to plot our loves on a really shiny chart. I think that's a dream we can all embrace.

Poll #1352948 Science, Take Two
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 296

Doctor Who (new): how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 5.62 Median: 6 Std. Dev 1.81
1
1 (0.4%)
2
8 (3.5%)
3
22 (9.6%)
4
38 (16.7%)
5
30 (13.2%)
6
55 (24.1%)
7
39 (17.1%)
8
25 (11.0%)
9
7 (3.1%)
10
3 (1.3%)

Doctor Who (new): canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 6.96 Median: 7 Std. Dev 1.55
1
0 (0.0%)
2
0 (0.0%)
3
8 (3.6%)
4
11 (4.9%)
5
17 (7.6%)
6
33 (14.7%)
7
70 (31.2%)
8
54 (24.1%)
9
24 (10.7%)
10
7 (3.1%)

Torchwood: how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 9.45 Median: 10 Std. Dev 0.97
1
0 (0.0%)
2
0 (0.0%)
3
0 (0.0%)
4
1 (0.4%)
5
0 (0.0%)
6
5 (2.1%)
7
6 (2.5%)
8
19 (8.0%)
9
48 (20.2%)
10
159 (66.8%)

Torchwood: canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 5.11 Median: 5 Std. Dev 1.92
1
1 (0.4%)
2
16 (6.9%)
3
38 (16.3%)
4
43 (18.5%)
5
35 (15.0%)
6
44 (18.9%)
7
30 (12.9%)
8
15 (6.4%)
9
7 (3.0%)
10
4 (1.7%)

Man from U.N.C.L.E.: how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 7.47 Median: 8 Std. Dev 1.87
1
1 (1.2%)
2
1 (1.2%)
3
1 (1.2%)
4
0 (0.0%)
5
11 (12.8%)
6
12 (14.0%)
7
10 (11.6%)
8
20 (23.3%)
9
21 (24.4%)
10
9 (10.5%)

Man from U.N.C.L.E.: canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 5.54 Median: 6 Std. Dev 1.44
1
1 (1.3%)
2
2 (2.6%)
3
5 (6.4%)
4
5 (6.4%)
5
24 (30.8%)
6
18 (23.1%)
7
20 (25.6%)
8
3 (3.8%)
9
0 (0.0%)
10
0 (0.0%)

Starsky & Hutch (and I take that ampersand is canon): how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 8.67 Median: 9 Std. Dev 1.39
1
0 (0.0%)
2
1 (0.9%)
3
0 (0.0%)
4
0 (0.0%)
5
3 (2.7%)
6
3 (2.7%)
7
10 (8.8%)
8
27 (23.9%)
9
31 (27.4%)
10
38 (33.6%)

Starsky & Hutch: canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 5.56 Median: 6 Std. Dev 1.73
1
0 (0.0%)
2
5 (5.1%)
3
9 (9.1%)
4
9 (9.1%)
5
21 (21.2%)
6
30 (30.3%)
7
16 (16.2%)
8
4 (4.0%)
9
2 (2.0%)
10
3 (3.0%)

The Professionals: how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 7.62 Median: 8 Std. Dev 1.59
1
0 (0.0%)
2
0 (0.0%)
3
2 (3.1%)
4
0 (0.0%)
5
5 (7.8%)
6
5 (7.8%)
7
15 (23.4%)
8
18 (28.1%)
9
12 (18.8%)
10
7 (10.9%)

The Professionals: canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 6.33 Median: 6 Std. Dev 1.59
1
0 (0.0%)
2
0 (0.0%)
3
1 (1.6%)
4
7 (11.5%)
5
12 (19.7%)
6
14 (23.0%)
7
12 (19.7%)
8
10 (16.4%)
9
3 (4.9%)
10
2 (3.3%)

Star Wars 4-6 (original trilogy): how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 4.89 Median: 5 Std. Dev 1.89
1
10 (4.6%)
2
16 (7.4%)
3
23 (10.6%)
4
41 (18.9%)
5
42 (19.4%)
6
42 (19.4%)
7
23 (10.6%)
8
16 (7.4%)
9
4 (1.8%)
10
0 (0.0%)

Star Wars 4-6 (original trilogy): canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 6.36 Median: 7 Std. Dev 1.68
1
2 (0.9%)
2
3 (1.4%)
3
7 (3.2%)
4
20 (9.3%)
5
27 (12.5%)
6
41 (19.0%)
7
61 (28.2%)
8
41 (19.0%)
9
11 (5.1%)
10
3 (1.4%)

Star Wars: The Phantom Menace: how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 6.70 Median: 7 Std. Dev 2.02
1
6 (3.1%)
2
3 (1.5%)
3
9 (4.6%)
4
6 (3.1%)
5
22 (11.3%)
6
24 (12.4%)
7
46 (23.7%)
8
49 (25.3%)
9
21 (10.8%)
10
8 (4.1%)

Star Wars: The Phantom Menace: canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 3.52 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.76
1
22 (11.4%)
2
42 (21.8%)
3
41 (21.2%)
4
35 (18.1%)
5
25 (13.0%)
6
16 (8.3%)
7
8 (4.1%)
8
3 (1.6%)
9
1 (0.5%)
10
0 (0.0%)

X-Files: how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 5.66 Median: 6 Std. Dev 2.00
1
7 (4.0%)
2
9 (5.2%)
3
7 (4.0%)
4
18 (10.4%)
5
33 (19.1%)
6
38 (22.0%)
7
31 (17.9%)
8
24 (13.9%)
9
0 (0.0%)
10
6 (3.5%)

X-Files: canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 7.01 Median: 7 Std. Dev 1.51
1
0 (0.0%)
2
0 (0.0%)
3
3 (1.8%)
4
6 (3.5%)
5
19 (11.1%)
6
28 (16.4%)
7
52 (30.4%)
8
35 (20.5%)
9
21 (12.3%)
10
7 (4.1%)

Sports Night: how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 7.66 Median: 8 Std. Dev 1.60
1
0 (0.0%)
2
2 (1.3%)
3
1 (0.7%)
4
1 (0.7%)
5
9 (6.0%)
6
16 (10.7%)
7
34 (22.8%)
8
42 (28.2%)
9
24 (16.1%)
10
20 (13.4%)

Sports Night: canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 8.31 Median: 9 Std. Dev 1.50
1
0 (0.0%)
2
1 (0.7%)
3
1 (0.7%)
4
3 (2.1%)
5
3 (2.1%)
6
5 (3.5%)
7
16 (11.3%)
8
41 (28.9%)
9
42 (29.6%)
10
30 (21.1%)

The O.C.: how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 7.16 Median: 7 Std. Dev 1.69
1
0 (0.0%)
2
0 (0.0%)
3
1 (1.4%)
4
3 (4.1%)
5
12 (16.4%)
6
7 (9.6%)
7
14 (19.2%)
8
24 (32.9%)
9
4 (5.5%)
10
8 (11.0%)

The O.C.: canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 5.39 Median: 6 Std. Dev 1.65
1
1 (1.4%)
2
2 (2.8%)
3
7 (9.9%)
4
11 (15.5%)
5
14 (19.7%)
6
16 (22.5%)
7
13 (18.3%)
8
7 (9.9%)
9
0 (0.0%)
10
0 (0.0%)

Hikaru no Go: how slashy?

View Answers
Mean: 8.29 Median: 9 Std. Dev 1.72
1
0 (0.0%)
2
0 (0.0%)
3
2 (2.9%)
4
0 (0.0%)
5
6 (8.7%)
6
2 (2.9%)
7
6 (8.7%)
8
12 (17.4%)
9
24 (34.8%)
10
17 (24.6%)

Hikaru no Go: canon writing quality?

View Answers
Mean: 8.00 Median: 8 Std. Dev 1.80
1
0 (0.0%)
2
0 (0.0%)
3
1 (1.5%)
4
0 (0.0%)
5
7 (10.3%)
6
7 (10.3%)
7
12 (17.6%)
8
9 (13.2%)
9
12 (17.6%)
10
20 (29.4%)
 
 
( Read 37 commentsLeave a comment )
dossierdossier on February 26th, 2009 02:38 am (UTC)
And Nicholas Lea was prettiest

I completely agree.